.Net MAUI vs Xamarin – Which Cross-platform Frameworks To Choose?

Summary: Because of how quickly the tech industry is changing, developers are constantly looking for strong frameworks to create dynamic, responsive cross-platform apps. Although the cross-platform UI framework Xamarin has been a reliable choice for many years, .NET MAUI is its modernized replacement. To assist you in choosing between .NET MAUI and Xamarin for your next project in 2025, we will compare the two in this blog post.

.NET MAUI (Multi-platform App UI) arose as an outgrowth of Xamarin. Microsoft Forms .NET MAUI, Microsoft’s next-generation cross-platform framework for developing native mobile and desktop apps in C# and XAML, seeks to increase developer efficiency by leveraging standard language features, trends, practices, and tools.

While both frameworks share some features, .NET MAUI overcomes constraints by offering a more current, effective, and user-friendly framework for cross-platform mobile application development. This new framework has major improvements that can boost efficiency and application performance.

Many firms are transitioning from Xamarin to .NET MAUI because the multi-platform app UI framework provides numerous advantages, including a unified project structure and enhanced graphics APIs. Because both frameworks, .NET MAUI and Xamarin, have strong capabilities, it is tough to pick which one to choose for developing intricate, feature-rich cross-platform programs.

But, before we get into an in-depth comparison of .NET MAUI vs Xamarin, let’s get a basic overview of each.

What is .NET MAUI?

.NET MAUI, commonly known as .NET Multi-platform App UI, is a popular cross-platform network for generating natively built desktop and mobile applications. Built on top of .NET 7, .NET MAUI enhances functionality and performance across all platforms. .NET MAUI Development enables to effortlessly construction of native user interfaces and applications for iOS, Android, MacOS, and Windows, all utilizing XAML and C# in a single codebase.

This multi-platform application UI framework makes designing easier by connecting elements to the platform. However, it remains capable of offering the necessary customization tools for developers to adjust the program to modern requirements. Microsoft’s .NET MAUI lets you develop code once and execute it on any device. It provides superior performance, greater efficiency, and a more simplified development experience than Xamarin Forms Developers can create a .NET app that runs natively on the target platforms.

What are the Features of .NET MAUI?

Here are some important elements of this new and advanced framework:

• XAML-based UI Design: Developers can use XAML as a standard language to create user interfaces for supported platforms. Enhanced Hot Reload functionality and capabilities allow for real-time UI changes and tweaks, as well as the construction of complicated layouts and styles.
• MVVM Architecture Support: .NET MAUI advocates for the Model-View-View (MVVM) architectural pattern, that isolates the user interface from business logic. The division of concerns streamlines application administration and improves testability.
• .NET Ecosystem Integration: It improves integration with the broader .NET ecosystem, allowing developers to use a variety of cutting-edge libraries and tools. This unified development experience reduces redundancy while streamlining the development process across several platforms.
• Dependency Injection: .NET MAUI has integrated support for the use of dependency injection (DI), a design paradigm for managing application dependencies. DI improves application testability by fostering clean architecture and allowing for the development of loosely linked components.
• Native User Interfaces: .NET MAUI allows developers to construct platform-specific user interfaces that improve the user experience across all devices. Custom UI controls can be defined by developers to take advantage of native features and create flexible layouts that respond to varied screen sizes and orientations.

Pros and Cons of .NET MAUI

PROS	CONS
Cross-platform development: iOS, Android, macOS, and Windows	Developing framework with continuous maturation.
Unified codebase for multiple platforms Native UI and Performance	Limited support for third-party libraries when compared to platform-specific options.
Leverage existing .NET and C# abilities.	The learning process for developers new to cross-platform development.
Access native APIs across platforms.	Potential performance overhead when compared to native development.
Hot Reload allows for speedier growth.	Certain platform-specific functionality may require unique implementation.
Integration with Visual Studio.	Larger application size than native apps

What is Xamarin?

Xamarin is a cross-platform development framework that uses C# and .NET to build apps. It has been a dependable framework for years, earning the trust of developers to create native mobile applications for iOS, Android, and Windows. Xamarin provides native performance and full access to platform-specific APIs and Xamarin.Forms for faster UI development. Microsoft supports the framework, which has been incorporated with Visual Studio.

Xamarin.Forms provide a rich set of pre-built pages, layouts, and features, allowing developers to create extremely responsive and visually stunning applications. For organizations that require their apps to be identical across all platforms, Xamarin is an excellent solution for cross-platform app development. Developers may reuse approximately 99% of their code to create apps for different platforms, saving a substantial amount of time. With a few little changes to the code scripts, developers can obtain near-native performance. This is one of the reasons why Xamarin is a superior choice to cross-platform frameworks like React Native and Flutter.

What are the Features of Xamarin?

• Modern IDE: Xamarin uses Visual Studio and Xamarin Studio to provide modern IDEs with capabilities such as integrated source control, managing projects, and code auto-complete.
• Xamarin apps use the.NET Base Class Library (BCL): Contains powerful XML handling, database access, serializing, and networking capabilities.
• Integration with Visual Studio: Simplifying development by providing a familiar environment for debugging, testing, and deployment. It also boosts productivity by allowing workers to work on Xamarin projects alongside other .NET ones.
• Native Multi-Platform Support: Xamarin offers developers with native tools and APIs for Android, iOS, and Windows. It enables the development of performance-driven apps with a native look and feel.
• Azure connectivity: Through seamless connectivity with Microsoft Azure Developers may include cloud services into apps, thereby increasing flexibility and scalability.
• Complete Binding: Xamarin provides strong bindings for practically all underlying platform SDKs on iOS and Android, ensuring a stable and type-safe development environment.

PROS and CONS of Xamarin

PROS	CONS
Ability to exchange as much as 90% of code between iOS, Android, and other platforms	Each platform still needs its own UI and graphics code.
Using a shared code and efficient development tools, you may reduce time to market significantly.	Forms can impair performance for sophisticated user interfaces.
Microsoft ownership offers guaranteed support, reliability, and regular upgrades.	Enterprises pay a somewhat higher fee for Visual Studio subscriptions.
Flexibility of C# and .NET framework with a wide ecosystem of libraries.	A smaller development community when compared to native development.
Xamarin provides a native user interface and improved speed. Android and Xamarin. iOS	Bundled libraries lead to a larger app size.

.NET MAUI vs Xamarin – A Quick Comparison

Both prominent frameworks, .NET MAUI, and Xamarin, have many similarities because they are based on the same .NET environment and are developed primarily for cross-platform app development. However, these frameworks differ in their performance, architecture, and development strategy. But, before we go into the full comparison of .NET MAUI vs Xamarin, take a look at the table below, which compares the two cross-platform development frameworks.

Factors	.NET MAUI	Xamarin
Project Architecture	A single-project, multi-platform strategy	Sharing code across separate projects for each platform.
Support for .NET 6	Built on.NET 6 and supports newer.NET versions.	Developed on Mono, used primarily for older .NET frameworks.
Rendered & Handler Architecture	.NET MAUI utilizes UI control handlers.	Xamarin employs specialized renderers for UI controls.
Platform Support	Android, iOS, macOS, Windows	Android, iOS, Windows
Integration with Microsoft Blazor	Native compatibility with Blazor components.	Limited support and requires further setup.
Platform Specific APIs	Supports a variety of platform-specific interfaces.	Some platform-specific APIs necessitate modified renderings to be compliant.
Hot Reload	Strong Hot Reload support for speedier development.	Hot Reload support is limited, depending on the version.
Resource Maintenance	Integrated resources system.	Platform-specific resources.
UI Framework	Latest Cross-platform user interfaces	Xamarin.Forms
Performance	Enhanced routine optimization	Increased native performance
Tooling	Top-notch visual studio tooling	Supports Visual studio
Learning Curve	Seamless for new developers	Steeper for multi-platform UI.

Comparing .NET MAUI vs Xamarin on Several Parameters

1. Architecture

The architectures of Xamarin and .NET MAUI differ greatly. Dot NET MAUI’s single project structure, which uses a unified .NET Multi-platform App UI framework, transforms cross-platform development. This method simplifies development by enabling developers to use a single codebase for both UI and business logic throughout all supported platforms. MAUI uses the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) design, which improves code structure and testability.

In comparison, Xamarin takes a more traditional approach, with distinct projects for each of the platforms (iOS, Android) and a shared project. While Xamarin. Forms support cross-platform user interfaces, the necessity for platform-specific applications to utilize native functionality might result in more complex project structures. This architectural difference has an impact on the development workflow, as well as the long-term maintenance and adaptability of systems.

2. Supports .NET 6 and Further Versions

.NET MAUI versions are consistent with the .NET release cycle. The addition of .NET 6 is a huge step forward for MAUI, harnessing the most recent capabilities and performance enhancements of the modern .NET framework. MAUI apps benefit from ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation, which leads to faster startup times and overall performance. This close connection enables developers to take use of cutting-edge language characteristics and optimizations.

Xamarin, which is based on older .NET frameworks and the Mono runtime, has limited support for .NET 6. Although Xamarin.Forms 5.0 made a gradual move to .NET 6 compliance, it still falls behind MAUI in terms of full .NET 6 feature support and performance improvements.

Enterprises that migrate to .NET MAUI can take advantage of the most recent .NET features and upgrades when developing unified desktop and mobile applications.

3. Development Environment

When it comes to .NET MAUI vs Xamarin, both frameworks rely on Visual Studio as their major development environment, which provides a consistent and efficient IDE for cross-platform app development. Both frameworks support Visual Studio for Windows and Mac, providing developers with familiar tools for building and managing mobile applications.

However, .NET MAUI streamlines the setup procedure by removing the need for extra extensions or tools. Developers may easily create .NET MAUI applications using Visual Studio or Visual Studio for Mac. By comparison, Xamarin. To fully utilize Forms’ development features, developers must first install Xamarin Studio or the required plugins.

4. Integrates with Microsoft Blazor

It fully interfaces with Microsoft Blazor, enabling developers to embed Blazor UI components using the BlazorWebView control. This allows for code reuse across web and mobile apps while also using web development expertise.

In a comparison between Xamarin with .NET MAUI, Xamarin’s Blazor support is more limited, frequently necessitating additional configuration and third-party libraries.

5. Performance

NET MAUI takes advantage of the major performance enhancements made in .NET 6 and later. Its applications gain from faster startup times thanks to ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation and better memory management. The reduced architecture of dotnet MAUI, together with its handler system, leads to improved overall efficiency, particularly in complicated UI contexts.

Xamarin, namely Xamarin Native has built a reputation for high performance. However, Xamarin.Forms may incur delayed rendering for sophisticated UIs, particularly when relying heavily on custom renderers. The performance difference between MAUI and Xamarin is particularly obvious in apps with complicated user interfaces or those that need intense processing operations.

6. Renderer and Handle-Based Architecture

When it comes to .Net MAUI vs Xamarin, the former adds a handler-based design for UI controls, which considerably improves on Xamarin’s renderer-based approach. Handlers in .NET MAUI are more successful and customizable, with a unified API for generating custom controls. This architecture minimizes the abstract layers that separate cross-platform and native controls, resulting in faster

7. performance and a lighter program

The Xamarin renderer architecture takes more code and is essentially platform-specific. Developers frequently need to design custom renderers for major UI changes in Xamarin, which adds complexity and possibly inconsistencies across platforms.

8. Lifecycle Management

It offers a uniform API for managing application and page lifecycles and presents a single approach to app lifecycle management across all supported platforms. This unification lowers the complexity often involved with managing various platform behaviors by streamlining state management and preservation. By writing more uniform cross-platform code, developers can decrease platform-specific problems and increase maintainability.

However, because Xamarin is less unified in nature, platform-specific lifecycle management is necessary. Developers frequently have to manage the iOS and Android lifecycles independently. More complicated code and possible platform-specific discrepancies in program behavior may result from this strategy.

9. Platform Specific APIs

A built-in drawing canvas is one of.NET MAUI’s cross-platform graphics features that enable developers to produce unique shapes, paints, and other visuals without the requirement for platform-specific code. The collection of platform-specific interfaces that .NET MAUI offers is one of its main benefits. In order to guarantee that their programs can benefit from the newest features and capabilities provided by the underlying operating systems, these interfaces allow developers to access native capabilities from each platform straight from their code.

Xamarin.Forms offers a number of cross-platform APIs for iOS, Android, and Windows. However, some platform-specific APIs require the implementation of specialized renderers or are not accessible on all systems.

10. Project Structure

For all major platforms (Android, iOS, Windows, and macOS), NET MAUI employs a single project structure. By enabling developers to handle a single codebase and project file for all target platforms, this method streamlines development.

With distinct projects for each supporting platform (Xamarin.Android, Xamarin.iOS) and a shared project or.NET Standard library for shared code, Xamarin employs a multi-project structure. Because of this structure, developers must oversee several project files and frequently use the same resources for platform-specific projects.

11. Supports Architectural Patterns

When contrasting MAUI to Xamarin, a follow-up framework offers developers greater flexibility by supporting a variety of architectural patterns:

• Model-View-ViewModel, or MVVM, is Xamarin’s classic pattern. forms, which MAUI likewise fully supports.
• The Elm architecture served as the inspiration for the more recent MVU (Model-View-Update) pattern, which enables more functional programming techniques.

The most popular and well-supported Xamarin method is the MVVM paradigm, which is the main emphasis of Xamarin. forms applications, but it is possible to use different patterns.

12. Resource Maintenance

Developers can manage resources (including fonts, styles, and graphics) for all platforms in one place with .NET MAUI’s unified resource system. When necessary, this system’s centralized methodology can identify platform-specific resources. MAUI’s resource management eliminates platform duplication and streamlines maintenance.

In contrast, Xamarin necessitates that developers handle resources independently for every platform. Because of this, it is frequently necessary to duplicate resources for platform-specific initiatives, which raises maintenance costs. Even though Xamarin.Forms made considerable advancements in cross-platform resource management, it still lacks the degree of uniformity that its successor provides.

13. Hot Reload Support

For a more productive programming experience, .NET MAUI provides improved support for Hot Reload. Without requiring a complete rebuild, it enables real-time adjustments to XAML, C#, resources, and assets across every supported platform (Android, iOS, Windows, and macOS). This capability greatly increases developer efficiency and is fully integrated with Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code.

Xamarin.Forms’ XAML Hot Reload functionality is limited. For Android and iOS, it mainly supports XAML Hot Reload, which enables real-time user interface modifications. It does not, however, support C# Hot Reload.

.MAUI development offers a more comprehensive and sophisticated cross-platform development experience than Xamarin when it comes to hot reload functionality.

Community and Ecosystem

Due to its longevity, Xamarin boasts a well-established and mature community. The cross-platform framework offers a wealth of third-party connectors, plugins, libraries, and resources. Experienced Xamarin developers around the world can provide developers with the help and direction they need.

Despite being relatively new, .NET MAUI has the support of Microsoft and is expanding quickly among enthusiastic developers and enthusiasts. As the use of .NET MAUI grows, so does the community. Additionally, developers have access to more and more documentation, examples, and community assistance.

When to Choose Xamarin vs .NET MAUI?

Let us assist you in better understanding where you can utilize both frameworks based on your suitability after going over the main distinctions between .NET MAUI vs Xamarin

Parameters	Choose .NET MAUI	Choose Xamarin
Project Complexity	Ideal for feature-rich, contemporary programs with intricate user interfaces and demanding performance needs	More appropriate for smaller projects that already use Xamarin
Development Approach	Simplified framework for a single project	Platform-specific methodology for independent project administration
Framework Support	.NET versions 6 and above	Restricted compatibility with .NET versions
Blazor Integration	Blazor-based hybrid app development	Due to its lack of native Blazor compatibility, hybrid usage cases are limited.
Performance	Select.NET MAUI to create applications with exceptional performance.	If you want simpler apps with less UI complexity, go for Xamarin.
Community & Ecosystem	Comparatively new, yet it contains Microsoft tools and a developing ecosystem.	A vibrant and responsible community for help and support

What is the Future of Xamarin and Cross-Platform App Development?

Building on Xamarin’s foundation, .NET MAUI provides a more unified development experience across several platforms. As a component of the broader.NET 8 ecosystems, it enables developers to create consistent brand experiences with a single codebase in less time by utilizing rich styling and visuals. For businesses that have already made investments in Microsoft technologies, .NET MAUI offers a distinct advantage due to its close interaction with the .NET ecosystem.

The next step for businesses that have invested in Xamarin is to switch to .NET MAUI. Although this change is required, it also offers chances to take advantage of new features and enhancements, as well as to future-proof programs by giving them access to the newest language features and performance enhancements. With .NET MAUI, businesses can create cutting-edge, effective apps while keeping a single codebase across several platforms.

Why Hire Concetto Labs for .NET MAUI or Xamarin App Development?

It can be challenging to choose between Xamarin and .NET MAUI as the finest cross-platform framework. Both .NET MAUI vs Xamarin are excellent frameworks for cross-platform mobile development, each with unique advantages and disadvantages. In addition to offering dependable support and compatibility with the latest developments in .NET, .NET MAUI is simple to use and understand. On the other hand, Xamarin has a sizable community and sophisticated tooling, having been in operation for some time.

While Xamarin is the best option for sustaining old applications or for simpler app development with low UI complexity, .NET MAUI is best suited for complicated cross-platform mobile development. Your project’s demands, objectives, and scope will determine the final decision. However, getting in touch with a top ASP.NET development company like ConcettoLabs might be helpful if you require expert help choosing the best cross-platform development framework or creating a feature-rich program from the start.